difference between alexandrian and antiochene christology pdf

1

0000002908 00000 n 0000003186 00000 n Este es a la vez poderoso y frgil, majestuoso y humilde. I was already a teacher by profession and I was searching for some B.Ed. i.e, word became flesh. One important distinction is that between Mosaic Law and natural law. Clement (d. ca. Origen identifies the content of natural law with what is known as the second table of the law, encompassing such prohibitions as murder, adultery, and false testimony. Origens chief target was Marcion (ca. The Alexandrian Christology is usually referred to as Christology from above, orLogos SarxChristology. The New Testament describes the early controversy over the question of whether to circumcise Gentile believers (Acts 15). Finally, I will conclude by arguing that the Reformed traditions approach to Mosaic Law contains both Alexandrian and Antiochene elements. [14] Riemer Roukema, Law of Nature, in The Westminster Handbook of Origen, ed. En una carta a Cirilo, Nestorio sostiene que Cirilo tena razn al ensear que las dos naturalezas de Cristo se unieron en una sola persona, y que tambin acertaba al decir que la divinidad no puede sufrir en s misma, pero que cuando contina diciendo que la deidad participa en el sufrimiento, l echa a perder toda su buena obra. This sets up another important distinction in Origens conception of Mosaic Lawnamely, that between the ceremonial law and the moral law. Nestorius was enthroned as archbishop on April 10th 428. For himself, he says, he has chosen to be on the. Cyril plunges into the debate with sharp invective, addressing one document To Nestorius, the new Judas. Philo used this allegorical approach to Scripture to prove that Moses was superior to any pagan philosophers. tuition and home schooling, secondary and senior secondary level, i.e. [7], Such was the heritage of Origens forbears. As a result, the Alexandrians tended to see Mosaic Law in terms of continuity, and the Antiochenes tended to see it in terms of discontinuity. Antiochene side. The goal of this paper will be to evaluate the life and work of one representative of the Alexandrian tradition, Origen of Alexandria. exams to Degree and Post graduation level. As Chau observes, The New Testament differs from the Old only in being a clearer, but not a fuller, manifestation of the spirit.[28], (See the conclusion of the paper in Part 2.). This Demiurge was not inherently evil, but was nevertheless inferior to the God of love and compassion revealed by Jesus. Antiochene side. WebAntiochene exegetes tended to insist more than their Alexandrian counterparts on the importance of seeing each biblical passage in its context within the longer narrative of Israels history, and to search for practical, moral applications, while Alexandrian interpreters tended to be more interested in the theological and spiritual meaning. While the Alexandrian school adopted the "hypostasis union" or the "nature union" of the [25], Third, Origen does not argue that the letters proper function is to kill. Palabras clave: Theotokos, Anthropotokos, Cristologa, Mariologa, Cirilo de Alejandra. 85-160), whose name has become synonymous with an excessively lowview of the Old Testament. It was generally in contrast with and sometimes opposed to the theology of Alexandria. Such blending of Greek and Jewish categories is also seen in his handling of Mosaic Law. Such a categorization would overlook the dual aspect of every text of Scripture. Resumen: Cirilo de Alejandra no slo fue uno de los mejores telogos cristianos de su poca, sino que tambin se destaca en las filas de los ms grandes escritores patrsticos de todas las generaciones, como quiz el ms poderoso exponente de la cristologa que la Iglesia haya conocido. John Anthony McGuckin (Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004), 139. Jesucristo era plenamente humano y plenamente divino. [1] The Alexandrian tradition thus placed a heavier emphasis on the trans-historical, spiritual meaning of Scripture, while the Antiochene tradition stressed the primacy of the literal, historically situated meaning of Scripture. However, church historians have long since recognized that this distinction is neither wholly accurate nor helpful in exegetical studies. This makes Origen unique among early Christian interpreters in ascribing such a pedagogical significance to the fall of Jerusalem. WebANTIOCHENE THEOLOGY The dominant theology of the early Church in Antioch. Rather than being a prison house, our bodies give us the opportunity to exercise virtue and grow into the likeness of God. Origens defense of Mosaic Law in his Commentary on Romans is rather complex, and it may be helpful to analyze his argument topically, in terms of various distinctions that he makes. Si Jess era humano, argumenta Cirilo, y si Dios estaba en otro lugar, la Encarnacin, la Palabra hecha carne, carecera de sentido. Nestorius was enthroned as archbishop on April 10th 428. 3:6). 185-254) was born in the Egyptian city of Alexandria to Christian parents. In the following centuries, the church faced opposition on two fronts. Grace is the essence of Sinai, but it is veiled until Calvary. In spite of some of his more idiosyncratic conclusions, Origen developed an exegetical method that would have a profound impact on subsequent theologians. More often, however, Origen makes use of a merely twofold distinction between the literal sense and the spiritual sense, in accordance with Pauls terminology of letter and spirit (2 Cor. On the one hand, Jewish interpreters insisted on the total and literal application of Mosaic Law, compelling Christians to defend the supremacy of the revelation of Christ. Alan J. Hauser and Duane F. Watson (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2003), 352. It is indeed a good and necessary step in the hermeneutical process. These traditions were distinguished, not so much by neatly distinct exegetical practices (as a previous generation of scholars had thought), as by differing conceptions of history, and by the respective influences of contemporary philosophical and rhetorical schools. There is no record of a formal school such as apparently existed at alexandria, although lucian of antioch directed his didascalion and Diodore of Tarsus his On the other hand, Gnostic interpreters often denigrated Mosaic Law by ascribing it to an inferior deity, compelling Christians to defend the inspiration and authority of the Old Testament. Change), You are commenting using your Facebook account. trailer << /Size 68 /Info 40 0 R /Root 43 0 R /Prev 25978 /ID[<3b600cd983abb0cf4f9f19502a618cce><3b600cd983abb0cf4f9f19502a618cce>] >> startxref 0 %%EOF 43 0 obj << /Pages 41 0 R /Type /Catalog /Outlines 14 0 R >> endobj 66 0 obj << /S 85 /T 149 /O 195 /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 67 0 R >> stream The contemporary historian Socrates called Nestorius a proud and ignorant man whose innate and undisputed oratorical power masked a weakness of incisive thought. Alexandria and Antioch had developed very different views on the matter: The Alexandrian school leaned towards Christs humanity and divinity being absorbed into each other while Antioch leaned towards maintaining the human and divine in Christ as two separate beings. ", Popular Controversies in World History: Investigating History's Intriguing Questions, Anglican Theological Review 94:3 (Summer), De Medio Aevo 2 (2012 / 2) ISSN-e 2255-5889. For instance, Wai-Shing Chau writes that Origen was operating on a Middle-platonic scheme, as is evident in his notions concerning the Father as the supreme mind, the existence of intermediaries between mind and the material world, and the pre-existence of the soul. He found, in the expressions Mother of God and God suffering, little more than an ignorant piety that had cut so many corners in its implications that it stood very close to pagan mythical conceptions of the deity. 0000008123 00000 n WebANTIOCH, SCHOOL OF The common doctrinal tendencies, particularly in exegesis and Christology, that characterized the theological thinkers and writers who represented the Antiochian tradition. 0000007720 00000 n First, it is a mistake to simply say that for Origen, ceremonial laws are literal, and moral laws are spiritual. Although Philo was Jewish, his impact would prove to be far greater on later Christian interpreters, such as Clement. In response to these teachings of Marcion, Origen defended the positive value and continuing relevance of Mosaic Law for Christians. This desire to avoid both the Scylla of Judaism and the Charybdis of Gnosticism (or better, Marcionism) set the stage for a multiplicity of Christian approaches to Mosaic Law. Even the ceremonial laws have a spiritual sense, although it may be comparatively more obscure than for the moral laws. By answering that question in the negative, the church acknowledged some degree of discontinuity with Mosaic Law. But rather than undermining the doctrine of biblical inspiration, Origen saw these inconsistencies as divinely intended pointers to the deeper, spiritual meaning. (LogOut/ In other words, WebCyril of Alexandria was not only one of the finest Christian theologians of his day, he also stands out in the ranks of the greatest patristic writers of all generations as perhaps the most powerful exponent of Christology the church has known. James O. Duke (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2009), 1:174-78. [6] Karlfried Froehlich, Biblical Interpretation in the Early Church (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984), 15-16. The Letter and the Spirit: A History of Interpretation from Origen to Luther (New York: Peter Lang, 1995), 16. the 10/12 Board [22], Second, Origen believes that the letter of the law is unattainable. [13] It is also Christianitys oldest surviving commentary on Romans, predating by about 150 years the second oldest commentary, written by John Chrysostom. Our Degree programs are offered by UGC approved Indian universities and recognized by competent authorities, thus successful learners are eligible for higher studies in regular mode and attempting PSC/UPSC exams. [12] This is the only commentary of Origens to have survived from beginning to end, even though it has been significantly truncated in the Latin translation of Rufinus of Aquileia (only a few scattered fragments of the original Greek still exist). El misterio de la Encarnacin segn Cirilo de Alejandra, From Philosophy to Pastoral: A Theological Review and the Pastoral Explications of the Doctrine of the Two Natures in Christ -Chalcedon and Luther, Cyril, Nestorius, and the Logos: A Re-Examination of Early Church Epistles, The Practical Christology of Philoxenos of Mabbug, E. Artemi, The Christological Controversy between Nestorius of Constantinople and Cyril of Alexandria, A Critical Assessment of St Cyril of Alexandrias On the Unity of Christ, and its Significance for Patristic and Modern Theology, Christological Controversies of the First Four Ecumenical Councils, Cyril of Alexandria and Gregory Nazianzen: Tradition and Complexity in Patristic Christology, The Early Christological Controversy: Apollinarius, Diodore, and Gregory Nazianzen. Cirilo insiste en que Mara, la madre de Dios, debe ser llamada Theotokos. Christ had two natures. (LogOut/ Online tuition for regular school students and home schooling children with clear options for high school completion certification from recognized boards is provided with quality content and coaching. There is no record of a formal school such as apparently existed at alexandria, although lucian of antioch directed his didascalion and Diodore of Tarsus his 0000009443 00000 n [4] Elizabeth Lauro, Reconsidering Origens Two Higher Senses of Scriptural Meaning: Identifying the Psychic and Pneumatic Senses, in Studia Patristica 34, ed. It is at once powerful and fragile, majestic and humble. Whether or not one is persuaded of Edwardss argument here, it is true that Origen sees bodily existence as basically good. St. Vladimirs Theological Quarterly 52, no. This article questions the value of the categories the school of Antioch and Antiochene christology on the basis of the significant theological differences between the two central figures in the school: John Chrysostom and Theodore of Mopsuestia, both of whom studied together at the school of Diodore of Tarsus in the late fourth century. [2] Henning Graf Reventlow, History of Biblical Interpretation, trans. !CYf} qC%/f9 jhA4i4OMUA\:>v'E3 {yhPVQgllY+5p}`NW. Para Nestorio, el lenguaje del intercambio de propiedades era en general sospechoso, y con frecuencia odioso. Cyril of Alexandria was not only one of the finest Christian theologians of his day, he also stands out in the ranks of the greatest patristic writers of all generations as perhaps the most powerful exponent of Christology the church has known. The solution for Origen was to uphold the Mosaic Laws spiritual meaning, as elucidated through the work of Christ. [11] Jews insisted on the total application of Mosaic Law, while Gnostics repudiated Mosaic Law altogether, but both camps were guilty of carnal exegesis. Thus, like his predecessors Philo and Clement, Origen believed that the essence of Mosaic Law is also found in natural law. The difference between Alexandria and Antioch was not exegetical; it was theological. M. F. Wiles and E. J. Yarnold (Peeters: Leuven, 2001), 306. 0000008565 00000 n Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 78 (2002), 57-78. Una de sus frases favoritas es: El Logos sufri impasiblemente. It would be a mistake to say that the literal sense of a text was irrelevant for Origen; rather, discerning the literal sense was the necessary means by which one could attain the spiritual sense. graduation. recommend Perfect E Learn for any busy professional looking to [4] The difference between the two non-literal senses is that the psychic concerns day-to-day ethical living, while the pneumatic concerns higher theological and christological truths. In particular, I will focus on his Commentary on Romans and show how his hermeneutical distinction between letter and spirit favors the continuity of Mosaic Law in Christian ethics. WebAlexandrian and Antiochian approaches to hermeneutics as deployed by John Chrysostom and Gregory of Nyssa as they work with the Beatitudes Typically, the view of Alexandrian and Antiochian hermeneutics has been one of dichotomy: Alexandrians were allegorical, and Antiochians were literal-historical. That is, the impossibility to keep the letter of the law is not due to human sin, as later Protestant interpreters would argue. Then, there were many different viewpoints of the doctrine proposed by Alexandrian School (ex: Arius, Athansius, and Apollinarius) and Antiochene School (ex: (LogOut/ [], [] Alexandrians vs. Antiochenes on Mosaic Law (Part 1) []. 0000001216 00000 n THE TRIAL OF EUTYCHES: A NEW INTERPRETATION, Catholicity and Heresy in the Early Church - Mark J. Edwards, Compare and contrast the theological schools of Alexandria and Antioch. Against this backdrop, it would be tempting to claim that Origen himself must have imbibed too much of Platonic thought. This distinction corresponds in some degree to his distinction between letter and spirit, and it is only the ceremonial law as letter that Origen rejects. 0000005673 00000 n [3] According to Elizabeth Lauro, the somatic sense can be understood as literal, whereas the psychic and pneumatic senses are non-literal. Dr. Pittenger's Criticism of the Alexandrine Christology.-In one place Dr. Pittenger admits that the Alexandrine and the Antiochene are two legitimate ways of thinking on the Person of our Lord, and that each of them will have adherents and admirers all the time. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Developing a conducive digital environment where students can pursue their 10/12 level, degree and post graduate programs from the comfort of their homes even if they are attending a regular course at college/school or working. This led him to a rather syncretistic blend of Hellenistic cosmology and Logos christology, with the result that later interpreters would fault Clement for some of his Gnostic tendencies. Externally, the schools are not as distinct as they have been made out to be: the Alexandrians do not allegorize away the OT as much as has been thought, and the Antiochenes are not necessarily more literal in their methods than the Alexandrians. Cirilo se sumerge en el debate con invectivas fuertes, remitiendo un documento Para Nestorio, el nuevo Judas. 0000009389 00000 n El historiador contemporneo Scrates Scholasticus calific a Nestorio de hombre orgulloso e ignorante, cuyo innato e indiscutible poder de oratoria ocult una debilidad de pensamiento incisivo. "Abstract. 0000007699 00000 n Edwards also questions the common assumption that Origen held to a doctrine of the pre-existence of the soul. Therefore, Origen understands the contrast between law and gospel not as one of judgment versus mercy, but rather imperfect religion versus perfect religion. Due to the papers original length, I will split it into two parts (Part 2 can be read here). Thomas Scheck (Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2002), 1-2. All the courses are of global standards and recognized by competent authorities, thus WebFrom 3rd to 4th century, Tertullian and Origen give a more complete doctrine of Christology. in KSA, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain. 0000008102 00000 n "The Council of Chalcedon 451: In Search of a Balanced and Nuanced Christology," in Seven Icons of Christ: Introduction to the Oecumenical Councils. Ever since its inception, the church has struggled to understand the proper place of Mosaic Law in Christian ethics. For Nestorius, the language of the exchange of properties was generally suspect, and often odious. In their Christology they stressed the divinity of Christ. I Alexandria had it's own form of Christology, that defined the Human Nature in the Hypostatic Union to be a generic human nature, and this was in contrast (although not incompatible) with the Antiochene Christology that define's Christ's Human nature as a specific human being. 0000005651 00000 n Conceiving Orthodox Christology, reviewing Cyril - pillar of faith'- Miaphysite Soteriology, in light of recent theological research, by Kasper, McGuckin, Meunier, Schoonenberg, Wickham, et al, Dogma and spirituality in Cyrillian logic. Nestorius argued that Theotokos did not do justice to the fact that, strictly speaking, Mary was not the mother of God but rather the mother of the man whom Christian faith recognizes as divine and thus calls God. WebAlexandria as they had his teacher Origen, but Arius almost single-handedly ushered in an era in which the church was well-nigh intoxicated with Christology, though he did so from a Trinitarian perspective and did not waste much time on the articulation between Christs disparate natures.

Clean Water Act Section 403 Summary, Quail Creek Property Owners Association, Articles D